Seventh Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago, Illinois, has appellate jurisdiction over courts in the following districts:

Two notable law and economics scholars sit on this court, Judge Frank Easterbrook and Judge Richard Posner.

Browse Opinions From the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Recent Decisions From the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Doe v. Loyola University Chicago  
Date: May 3, 2024
Docket Number: 22-2925

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves John Doe, a student who was expelled from Loyola University Chicago after the university concluded that he had engaged in non-consensual sexual activity with Jane Roe, another student. Doe sued the…

Marshall v. Johnson  
Date: May 3, 2024
Docket Number: 23-2212

Justia Opinion Summary: Edward Johnson filed for bankruptcy relief under Chapter 13 and made payments to the bankruptcy trustee, Marilyn O. Marshall, under his proposed repayment plan. However, the bankruptcy court never confirmed his plan due…

Wayde Coleman v. Josh Peters
Date: May 3, 2024
Docket Number: 23-3353
USA v. Keith Brown
Date: May 2, 2024
Docket Number: 22-1855
Stop Illinois Health Care Fraud, LLC v. Sayeed  
Date: May 2, 2024
Docket Number: 22-3295

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves Asif Sayeed and three associated healthcare companies who were found liable for violating the Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act, resulting in a nearly $6 million judgment. Sayeed owned a…

Stop Illinois Health Care Fraud, LLC v. Asif Sayeed
Date: May 2, 2024
Docket Number: 23-1943
Javier Carmona-Albarran v. Merrick B. Garland
Date: May 2, 2024
Docket Number: 23-3278
United States v. Anderson  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 21-1325

Justia Opinion Summary: The case revolves around Denny Anderson, who was sentenced in 2012 for possessing a firearm as a felon, after shooting at a man and using racial slurs. The maximum penalty for the illegal-possession offense is typically…

Sabo v. Erickson  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 21-3332

Justia Opinion Summary: The case revolves around John Sabo, who was sentenced to a probation term that exceeded the maximum limit set by Wisconsin law. After his probation should have ended, he was imprisoned for violating its conditions. Sabo…

United States v. Feeney  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 22-2607

Justia Opinion Summary: John Feeney, a convicted felon, was charged with unlawfully possessing two pistols and carrying explosives, specifically modified fireworks shells, during the commission of that felony. Feeney pleaded guilty to both…

United States v. Brooks  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 22-2764

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves Thomas Brooks, II, who was charged with and pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. The incident occurred when Brooks was leaving an apartment complex and saw police officers…

Rongere v. City of Rockford  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 23-1761

Justia Opinion Summary: Monica Rongere, a former Diversity Procurement Officer for the City of Rockford, Illinois, sued the city after her employment was terminated. Rongere claimed that she was overworked and underpaid compared to her male…

Pit Row, Inc. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 23-1800

Justia Opinion Summary: This case involves a dozen gas stations in the Green Bay, Wisconsin area, who alleged that Costco Wholesale Corporation violated a Wisconsin law prohibiting the sale of gasoline below a statutorily defined cost. The…

Moore v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue  
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 23-2681

Justia Opinion Summary: Scott and Gayla Moore, a married couple, claimed a tax credit under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code for research expenses for the 2014 and 2015 tax years. The Moores treated the salary and bonus of Gary Robert,…

Eddie Hatch, Jr. v. Tom Barrett
Date: April 30, 2024
Docket Number: 23-3051

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.