FIELD v. SEABURY, 60 U.S. 333 (1856)
U.S. Supreme Court
FIELD v. SEABURY, 60 U.S. 333 (1856)
60 U.S. 333 (How.)
EDWARD FIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PARDON G. SEABURY ET AL.
December Term, 1856
THIS, like the preceding case, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of California. It was argued in connection with the preceding case.
Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.
This case was like the preceding, and they were argued together.
For the reasons given in the first of them, the court directs the reversal of the judgment in the court below, in this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
FIELD v. SEABURY, 60 U.S. 333 (1856)
60 U.S. 333 (How.)
EDWARD FIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PARDON G. SEABURY ET AL.
December Term, 1856
THIS, like the preceding case, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of California. It was argued in connection with the preceding case.
Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.
Page 60 U.S. 333, 334
This case was like the preceding, and they were argued together.
For the reasons given in the first of them, the court directs the reversal of the judgment in the court below, in this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
