JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY, 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
397 U.S. 821
Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.