JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY, 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970)397 U.S. 821
Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of
Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for
further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.[ Jefferson
v. Hackney 397 U.S.
821 (1970) ]
Opinions
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States May 4, 1970 Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants. Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970) 397 U.S. 821 Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States May 4, 1970 Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants. Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]
Search This Case
