ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., 397 U.S. 820 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970)

397 U.S. 820

Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.
v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970)

 397 U.S. 820

Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.
v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.