ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., 397 U.S. 820 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970)
397 U.S. 820
Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.
v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970)
Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.
v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.