STAMLER v. WILLIS, 393 U.S. 407 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
STAMLER v. WILLIS, 393 U.S. 407 (1969)
393 U.S. 407 STAMLER ET AL. v. WILLIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 478.
Decided January 20, 1969.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 479, Cohen v. Willis et al., also on appeal from the same court.
Rehearing denied; ante, p. 217, vacated; 287 F. Supp. 734, vacated and remanded.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478 on the petition for rehearing and motion to amend.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a rehearing is denied. The motion to amend the judgment entered on November 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. The judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
U.S. Supreme Court
STAMLER v. WILLIS, 393 U.S. 407 (1969)
393 U.S. 407 STAMLER ET AL. v. WILLIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 478.
Decided January 20, 1969.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 479, Cohen v. Willis et al., also on appeal from the same court.
Rehearing denied; ante, p. 217, vacated; 287 F. Supp. 734, vacated and remanded.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478 on the petition for rehearing and motion to amend.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a rehearing is denied. The motion to amend the judgment entered on November 25, 1968, dismissing the appeals is granted. The judgment dismissing the appeals is vacated and a new judgment will issue providing that the judgment below be vacated and the cases be remanded to the District Court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeals may be taken to the Court of Appeals.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Page 393 U.S. 407, 408
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
