ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., 397 U.S. 820 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970)397 U.S. 820
Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of
New York, et al.
v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of
St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v.
Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970) 397 U.S. 820 Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379. Supreme Court of the United States May 4, 1970 Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants. James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]
