LAMPTON v. BONIN, 397 U.S. 663 (1970)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

LAMPTON v. BONIN , 397 U.S. 663 (1970)

397 U.S. 663

Shirley LAMPTON et al.
v.
Garland L. BONIN et al.
No. 1112, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 27, 1970

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1970.

See 398 U.S. 945.

Jeffrey B. Schwartz and Richard S. Buckley, for appellants.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler and Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the judgment of the United States District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACK dissent for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Black's dissenting opinion in Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 430.[ Lampton v. Bonin 397 U.S. 663 (1970) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

LAMPTON v. BONIN , 397 U.S. 663 (1970)

 397 U.S. 663

Shirley LAMPTON et al.
v.
Garland L. BONIN et al.
No. 1112, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 27, 1970

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1970.

See 398 U.S. 945.

Jeffrey B. Schwartz and Richard S. Buckley, for appellants.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler and Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the judgment of the United States District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACK dissent for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Black's dissenting opinion in Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 430.[ Lampton v. Bonin 397 U.S. 663 (1970) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.