U.S. v. DALLES MILITARY ROAD CO., 148 U.S. 49 (1893)

U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. DALLES MILITARY ROAD CO., 148 U.S. 49 (1893)

148 U.S. 49

UNITED STATES
v.
DALLES MILITARY ROAD CO. et al.

No. 1,159.

March 6, 1893

In equity. Bill by the United States against the Dalles Military Road Company and others to forfeit a land grant. The United States appeals from a decree of the circuit court of appeals (2 C. C. A. 419, 51 Fed. Rep. 629) affirming a decree of the circuit court dismissing the bill.

For other opinions rendered in the course of this litigation, see 40 Fed. Rep. 114; 41 Fed. Rep. 493; 140 U.S. 599, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 988.

Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker. for the United States.

John F. Dillon, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Browne, for California & Oregon Land Co. Jas. K. Kelly, for Dalles Military Road Co.

BREWER, Circuit Justice.

The questions in this case are substantially the same as those in No. 1,073,-U. S. v. California & Oregon Land Co., 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 458. It is unnecessary, therefore, to state the facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the same decree of affirmance will be entered.[ U.S. v. Dalles Military Road Co. 148 U.S. 49 (1893) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. DALLES MILITARY ROAD CO., 148 U.S. 49 (1893)

 148 U.S. 49

UNITED STATES
v.
DALLES MILITARY ROAD CO. et al.

No. 1,159.

March 6, 1893

In equity. Bill by the United States against the Dalles Military Road Company and others to forfeit a land grant. The United States appeals from a decree of the circuit court of appeals (2 C. C. A. 419, 51 Fed. Rep. 629) affirming a decree of the circuit court dismissing the bill.

For other opinions rendered in the course of this litigation, see 40 Fed. Rep. 114; 41 Fed. Rep. 493; 140 U.S. 599, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 988.

Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker. for the United States.

John F. Dillon, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Browne, for California & Oregon Land Co. Jas. K. Kelly, for Dalles Military Road Co.

BREWER, Circuit Justice.

The questions in this case are substantially the same as those in No. 1,073,-U. S. v. California & Oregon Land Co., 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 458. It is unnecessary, therefore, to state the facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the same decree of affirmance will be entered.[ U.S. v. Dalles Military Road Co. 148 U.S. 49 (1893) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.