Escanaba Company v. Chicago,
107 U.S. 678 (1883)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Escanaba Company v. Chicago, 107 U.S. 678 (1883)

Escanaba Company v. Chicago

Decided March 5, 1883

107 U.S. 678


1. The Chicago River and its branches, although lying within the limits of the State of Illinois, are navigable waters of the United States over which Congress, in the exercise of its power under the commerce clause of the Constitution, may exercise control to the extent necessary to protect, preserve, and improve their free navigation; but until that body acts, the state has plenary authority over bridges across them, and may vest in Chicago jurisdiction over the construction, repair, and use of those bridges within the city.

2. There is nothing in the ordinance of July 13, 1787, or in the subsequent legislation of Congress that precludes the state from exercising that authority.

Page 107 U. S. 679

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.