STUART v. WILSON, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 361 U.S. 232
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/232/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/232/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
STUART v. WILSON, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)
361 U.S. 232 STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 495.
Decided January 11, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and John Wildenthal, Jr. and Tom I. McFarling, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEWIS v. MOORE, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)
361 U.S. 232 LEWIS v. MOORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 540.
Decided January 11, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 250 N.C. 77, 108 S. E. 2d 26.
Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.