STUART v. WILSON
361 U.S. 232 (1960)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

STUART v. WILSON, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

361 U.S. 232

STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 495.
Decided January 11, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and John Wildenthal, Jr. and Tom I. McFarling, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


LEWIS v. MOORE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/361/232/case.html">361 U.S. 232</a> (1960) 361 U.S. 232 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LEWIS v. MOORE, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

361 U.S. 232

LEWIS v. MOORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 540.
Decided January 11, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 250 N.C. 77, 108 S. E. 2d 26.

Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 232, 233




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.