STUART v. WILSON
361 U.S. 232 (1960)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
STUART v. WILSON, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)
361 U.S. 232 STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 495.
Decided January 11, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and John Wildenthal, Jr. and Tom I. McFarling, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEWIS v. MOORE, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)
361 U.S. 232 LEWIS v. MOORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 540.
Decided January 11, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 250 N.C. 77, 108 S. E. 2d 26.
Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.