JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD - 392 U.S. 296 (1968)


U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD, 392 U.S. 296 (1968)

392 U.S. 296

JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 1398.
Decided June 10, 1968.

353 Mass. 540, 233 N. E. 2d 316, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

David Berman for appellant.

Arthur V. Getchell for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PERLA v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/392/296/case.html">392 U.S. 296</a> (1968) 392 U.S. 296 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PERLA v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 296 (1968)

392 U.S. 296

PERLA v. NEW YORK ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1407.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 608, 237 N. E. 2d 215, reversed.

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273.

Page 392 U.S. 296, 297






Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.