JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD
392 U.S. 296 (1968)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD, 392 U.S. 296 (1968)
392 U.S. 296 JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 1398.
Decided June 10, 1968.
353 Mass. 540, 233 N. E. 2d 316, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
David Berman for appellant.
Arthur V. Getchell for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
PERLA v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 296 (1968)
392 U.S. 296 PERLA v. NEW YORK ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1407.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 608, 237 N. E. 2d 215, reversed.
Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273.
