SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BROWN, 393 U.S. 222 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BROWN, 393 U.S. 222 (1968) 393 U.S. 222SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 553.
Decided December 9, 1968.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 563, Cribb et al. v. Brown et al., also on appeal from the same court.
Affirmed.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and D. W. Robinson for appellants in No. 553. J. C. Long for appellants in No. 563.
Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellee United States in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 553.
Decided December 9, 1968.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 563, Cribb et al. v. Brown et al., also on appeal from the same court. Affirmed. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and D. W. Robinson for appellants in No. 553. J. C. Long for appellants in No. 563. Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellee United States in both cases. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 393 U.S. 222, 223
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BROWN, 393 U.S. 222 (1968) 393 U.S. 222 SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 553.
Decided December 9, 1968.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 563, Cribb et al. v. Brown et al., also on appeal from the same court. Affirmed. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and D. W. Robinson for appellants in No. 553. J. C. Long for appellants in No. 563. Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellee United States in both cases. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 393 U.S. 222, 223
Search This Case
