SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BROWN, 393 U.S. 222 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BROWN, 393 U.S. 222 (1968)

393 U.S. 222

SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 553.
Decided December 9, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 563, Cribb et al. v. Brown et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Affirmed.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and D. W. Robinson for appellants in No. 553. J. C. Long for appellants in No. 563.

Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellee United States in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 222, 223

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BROWN, 393 U.S. 222 (1968)

393 U.S. 222

SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 553.
Decided December 9, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 563, Cribb et al. v. Brown et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Affirmed.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and D. W. Robinson for appellants in No. 553. J. C. Long for appellants in No. 563.

Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellee United States in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 222, 223

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.