ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R.W. TRAINMEN, 385 U.S. 20 (1966)
Argued:
October 10, 1966
Decided:
October 24, 1966
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R.W. TRAINMEN, 385 U.S. 20 (1966) 385 U.S. 20ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET.
AL. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY
TRAINMEN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH
CIRCUIT. No. 220.
Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.
362 F.2d 649, affirmed.
Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.
Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
TRAINMEN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 220.
Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.
362 F.2d 649, affirmed. Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck. Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 385 U.S. 20, 21
U.S. Supreme Court
ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R.W. TRAINMEN, 385 U.S. 20 (1966) 385 U.S. 20 ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAYTRAINMEN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 220.
Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.
362 F.2d 649, affirmed. Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck. Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 385 U.S. 20, 21
Search This Case
