ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R.W. TRAINMEN, 385 U.S. 20 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R.W. TRAINMEN, 385 U.S. 20 (1966)

385 U.S. 20

ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY
TRAINMEN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 220.
Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.

362 F.2d 649, affirmed.

Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.

Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 385 U.S. 20, 21




U.S. Supreme Court

ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R.W. TRAINMEN, 385 U.S. 20 (1966)

385 U.S. 20

ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY
TRAINMEN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 220.
Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.

362 F.2d 649, affirmed.

Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.

Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 385 U.S. 20, 21

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.