Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley, 94 U.S. 179 (1876)

U.S. Supreme Court

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley, 94 U.S. 179 (1876)

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley

94 U.S. 179

Syllabus

A railroad company in Wisconsin cannot recover for the transportation of property more than the maximum fixed by the act of that State of March 11,1874, by showing that the amount charged was no more than a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.

U.S. Supreme Court

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley, 94 U.S. 179 (1876)

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley

94 U.S. 179

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

COUNTY OF MILWAUKEE, STATE OF WISCONSIN

Syllabus

A railroad company in Wisconsin cannot recover for the transportation of property more than the maximum fixed by the act of that State of March 11,1874, by showing that the amount charged was no more than a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question presented by this record is whether a railroad company in Wisconsin can recover for the transportation of property more than the maximum fixed by the act of March 11, 1874, by showing that the amount charged was no more than a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.

What we have already said in Peik v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company and Lawrence v. Same, supra, p. 94 U. S. 164, is applicable to this case. As between the company and a freighter, there is a statutory limitation of the charge for transportation actually performed. If the company should refuse to carry at the prices fixed, and an attempt should be made to forfeit its charter on that account, other questions might arise, which it will be time enough to consider when they are presented. But for goods actually carried, the limit of the recovery is that prescribed by the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD and MR. JUSTICE STRONG dissented.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.