Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company,
93 U.S. 241 (1876)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 93 U.S. 241 (1876)

Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

93 U.S. 241


The doctrine in Lee v. Watson, 1 Wall. 337, that,

"in an action upon a money demand, where the general issue is pleaded, the matter in dispute is the debt claimed, and its amount, as stated in the body of the declaration, and not merely the damages alleged or the prayer for judgment at its conclusion must be considered in determining whether this Court can take jurisdiction,"

affirmed and applied to the present case.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.