AGRICULTURAL CO. v. PIERCE COUNTY, 73 U.S. 246 (1867)
U.S. Supreme Court
AGRICULTURAL CO. v. PIERCE COUNTY, 73 U.S. 246 (1867)
73 U.S. 246 (Wall.)
AGRICULTURAL COMPANY
v.
PIERCE COUNTY.
December Term, 1867
ERROR to the Supreme Court of Washington Territory.
The writ of error bore date January 20th, 1862. It was on its face made returnable on the second Monday of December next after its date, when it should have been the first Monday of that month, which is by law the day on which the terms of this court commence each year.
For this cause (Mr. Justice MILLER, announcing the order), the writ of error was dismissed under the authority of the cases of Carroll v. Dorsey,1Insurance Company v. Mordecai,2 and Porter v. Foley,3 heretofore decided by this court.
Messrs. Lander and Carlisle, for the plaintiff in error; no o posite counsel appearing nor having entered their appearance of record.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 20 Howard, 204.
Footnote 2 21 Id. 195.
Footnote 3 Id. 393.[ Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County
Footnote 73 U.S. 246 (1867) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
AGRICULTURAL CO. v. PIERCE COUNTY, 73 U.S. 246 (1867)
73 U.S. 246 (Wall.)
AGRICULTURAL COMPANY
v.
PIERCE COUNTY.
December Term, 1867
ERROR to the Supreme Court of Washington Territory.
The writ of error bore date January 20th, 1862. It was on its face made returnable on the second Monday of December next after its date, when it should have been the first Monday of that month, which is by law the day on which the terms of this court commence each year.
For this cause (Mr. Justice MILLER, announcing the order), the writ of error was dismissed under the authority of the cases of Carroll v. Dorsey,1Insurance Company v. Mordecai,2 and Porter v. Foley,3 heretofore decided by this court.
Messrs. Lander and Carlisle, for the plaintiff in error; no o posite counsel appearing nor having entered their appearance of record.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 20 Howard, 204.
Footnote 2 21 Id. 195.
Footnote 3 Id. 393.[ Agricultural Co. v. Pierce County
Footnote 73 U.S. 246 (1867) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.