Sharp v. Murphy, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________

No. 17–1107

_________________

TOMMY SHARP, interim WARDEN, PETITIONER v. PATRICK DWAYNE MURPHY

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit

[July 9, 2020]

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. Oklahoma, ante, p. ___.

It is so ordered.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Justice Thomas and Justice Alito dissent.

February 6, 2018 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2018)
February 26, 2018 Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2018 to April 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
February 28, 2018 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 9, 2018.
March 9, 2018 Brief amici curiae of Environmental Federation of Oklahoma, Inc., et al. filed.
March 9, 2018 Brief amicus curiae of Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association filed.
March 9, 2018 Brief amicus curiae of United States of America filed.
April 9, 2018 Brief of respondent Patrick Dwayne Murphy in opposition filed.
April 23, 2018 Reply of petitioner Terry Royal, Warden filed.
April 24, 2018 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.
May 14, 2018 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/17/2018.
May 21, 2018 Petition GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
May 23, 2018 Motion of Terry Royal, Warden for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (June 20, 2018)
June 20, 2018 Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended and including July 23, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 7, 2018.
June 20, 2018 Motion for an extension of time filed.
July 23, 2018 Brief of petitioner Mike Carpenter, Interim Warden filed.
July 23, 2018 Joint appendix (2 volumes) filed.
July 25, 2018 Letter of July 23, 2018, received from counsel for the petitioner.
July 30, 2018 Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.
July 30, 2018 Brief amicus curiae of Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association filed.
July 30, 2018 Brief amici curiae of Oklahoma Sheriffs’ Association, et al. filed.
July 30, 2018 Brief amici curiae of States of Nebraska, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Wyoming, and Paul R. LePage, Governor of Maine filed.
July 30, 2018 Brief amici curiae of Environmental Federation of Oklahoma, Inc., et al. filed.
July 30, 2018 Brief amicus curiae of United States of America filed.
August 27, 2018 Motion of Patrick Dwayne Murphy for an extension of time submitted.
August 27, 2018 Response of Mike Carpenter, Interim Warden to motion submitted.
August 27, 2018 Response of Mike Carpenter, Interim Warden to motion submitted.
August 27, 2018 Motion for a further extension of time filed.
August 27, 2018 Response of Mike Carpenter, Interim Warden to motion not accepted for filing. (To be resubmitted - August 29, 2018)
August 27, 2018 Response to motion from petitioner Mike Carpenter, Interim Warden filed.
August 29, 2018 Motion for a further extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted in part, and the time is extended to and including September 19, 2018.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.