PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990)

U.S. Supreme Court

PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990)

498 U.S. 38

PERRY v. LOUISIANA
CERTIORARI TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA

No. 89-5120

Argued October 2, 1990
Decided November 13, 1990

    Vacated and remanded.

Keith B. Nordyke argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were June E. Denlinger and Joe Giarrusso, Jr.

    Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the breif were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General.*

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies.

PER CURIAM

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)

It is so ordered.

JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 498 U.S. 38, 39




U.S. Supreme Court

PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990)

498 U.S. 38

PERRY v. LOUISIANA
CERTIORARI TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA

No. 89-5120

Argued October 2, 1990
Decided November 13, 1990

    Vacated and remanded.

Keith B. Nordyke argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were June E. Denlinger and Joe Giarrusso, Jr.

    Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the breif were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General.*

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies.

PER CURIAM

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)

It is so ordered.

JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 498 U.S. 38, 39

Oral Argument - October 02, 1990
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.