PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990)
U.S. Supreme Court
PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990)
498 U.S. 38 PERRY v. LOUISIANA
CERTIORARI TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 89-5120
Argued October 2, 1990
Decided November 13, 1990
- Vacated and remanded.
- Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the breif were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General.*
[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies.
PER CURIAM
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)
It is so ordered.
JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990)
498 U.S. 38 PERRY v. LOUISIANA
CERTIORARI TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 89-5120
Argued October 2, 1990
Decided November 13, 1990
- Vacated and remanded.
- Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the breif were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General.*
[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies.
PER CURIAM
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)
It is so ordered.
JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 498 U.S. 38, 39
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.