OHIO v. HUERTAS, 498 U.S. 336 (1991)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

OHIO v. HUERTAS, 498 U.S. 336 (1991)

498 U.S. 336

OHIO v. HUERTAS
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
 
No. 89-1944.
 
Argued January 16, 1991
Decided January 22, 1991

    Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 51 Ohio St. 3d 22, 553 N.E.2d

    1058.

Jonathan E. Rosenbaum argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Joann Bour-Stokes, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 935, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Randall M. Dana, Davis C. Stebbins, and Richard J. Vickers.*

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the United States by Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Mueller, Deputy Solicitor General Bryson, and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.; and for the Washington Legal Foundation et al. by Daniel J. Popeo and Paul D. Kamenar.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the National Jury Project by Samuel R. Gross; for the National Legal Aid and Defender Association by Jennifer P. Lyman; and for Barbara Babcock et al. by Louis D. Bilionis and Richard A. Rosen.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the State of California by John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Harley D. Mayfield, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frederick R. Millar, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Jay M. Bloom, Deputy Attorney General; for the Appellate Committee of the California District Attorneys Association by Ira Reiner, Harry B. Sondheim, and Martha E. Bellinger; for Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation by Vivian Berger; and for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al. by Margery Malkin Koosed, Harry R. Reinhart, and Dennis Balske.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 498 U.S. 336, 337

 


U.S. Supreme Court

OHIO v. HUERTAS, 498 U.S. 336 (1991)

498 U.S. 336

OHIO v. HUERTAS
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
 
No. 89-1944.
 
Argued January 16, 1991
Decided January 22, 1991

    Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 51 Ohio St. 3d 22, 553 N.E.2d

    1058.

Jonathan E. Rosenbaum argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Joann Bour-Stokes, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 935, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Randall M. Dana, Davis C. Stebbins, and Richard J. Vickers.*

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the United States by Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Mueller, Deputy Solicitor General Bryson, and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.; and for the Washington Legal Foundation et al. by Daniel J. Popeo and Paul D. Kamenar.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the National Jury Project by Samuel R. Gross; for the National Legal Aid and Defender Association by Jennifer P. Lyman; and for Barbara Babcock et al. by Louis D. Bilionis and Richard A. Rosen.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the State of California by John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Harley D. Mayfield, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frederick R. Millar, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Jay M. Bloom, Deputy Attorney General; for the Appellate Committee of the California District Attorneys Association by Ira Reiner, Harry B. Sondheim, and Martha E. Bellinger; for Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation by Vivian Berger; and for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al. by Margery Malkin Koosed, Harry R. Reinhart, and Dennis Balske.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 498 U.S. 336, 337

Oral Argument - January 16, 1991
Opinion Announcement - January 22, 1991
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.