UNITED STATES v. FRANCE, 498 U.S. 335 (1991)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. FRANCE, 498 U.S. 335 (1991)

498 U.S. 335

UNITED STATES v. FRANCE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 89-1363.

Argued October 2, 1990
Decided January 22, 1991

886 F.2d 223, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Deputy Solicitor General Bryson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Dennis, and Brian J. Martin.

Michael R. Levine, by appointment of the Court, 495 U.S. 945, argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 498 U.S. 335, 336




U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. FRANCE, 498 U.S. 335 (1991)

498 U.S. 335

UNITED STATES v. FRANCE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 89-1363.

Argued October 2, 1990
Decided January 22, 1991

886 F.2d 223, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Deputy Solicitor General Bryson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Dennis, and Brian J. Martin.

Michael R. Levine, by appointment of the Court, 495 U.S. 945, argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 498 U.S. 335, 336

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.