UNITED STATES v. FRANCE, 498 U.S. 335 (1991)
Argued:
October 2, 1990
Decided:
January 22, 1991
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. FRANCE, 498 U.S. 335 (1991) 498 U.S. 335UNITED STATES v. FRANCE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
CIRCUIT
No. 89-1363.
Argued October 2, 1990
Decided January 22, 1991
886 F.2d 223, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Deputy Solicitor General Bryson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Dennis, and Brian J. Martin.
Michael R. Levine, by appointment of the Court, 495 U.S. 945, argued the cause for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 89-1363.
Argued October 2, 1990
Decided January 22, 1991
886 F.2d 223, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Deputy Solicitor General Bryson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Dennis, and Brian J. Martin. Michael R. Levine, by appointment of the Court, 495 U.S. 945, argued the cause for respondent. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court. JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 498 U.S. 335, 336
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. FRANCE, 498 U.S. 335 (1991) 498 U.S. 335 UNITED STATES v. FRANCECERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 89-1363.
Argued October 2, 1990
Decided January 22, 1991
886 F.2d 223, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Deputy Solicitor General Bryson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Dennis, and Brian J. Martin. Michael R. Levine, by appointment of the Court, 495 U.S. 945, argued the cause for respondent. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court. JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 498 U.S. 335, 336
Search This Case
