BROTHERHOOD OF R.R. SIGNALMEN v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, 489 U.S. 1301 (1989)

U.S. Supreme Court

BROTHERHOOD OF R.R. SIGNALMEN v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA , 489 U.S. 1301 (1989)

489 U.S. 1301

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN et al.
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. No. A-715.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1989

On application to vacate injunction.

Justice BRENNAN, Circuit Justice.

Applicants request me, as Circuit Justice, to enter an order " immediately dissolving" the injunction issued by the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I deny the application. In my view, applicants have not "established that there is a 'reasonable probability' that four Justices will consider the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari." Rostker v. Goldberg, 448 U.S. 1306, 1308, 2 (1980) (Chambers Opinion).[ Brotherhood of R.R. Signalmen v. S.E. Penns .Transp. Authority 489 U.S. 1301 (1989) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

BROTHERHOOD OF R.R. SIGNALMEN v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA , 489 U.S. 1301 (1989)

489 U.S. 1301

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN et al.
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. No. A-715.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1989

On application to vacate injunction.

Justice BRENNAN, Circuit Justice.

Applicants request me, as Circuit Justice, to enter an order " immediately dissolving" the injunction issued by the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I deny the application. In my view, applicants have not "established that there is a 'reasonable probability' that four Justices will consider the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari." Rostker v. Goldberg, 448 U.S. 1306, 1308, 2 (1980) (Chambers Opinion).[ Brotherhood of R.R. Signalmen v. S.E. Penns .Transp. Authority 489 U.S. 1301 (1989) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.