VAN DRASEK v. WEBB, 481 U.S. 738 (1987)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

VAN DRASEK v. WEBB, 481 U.S. 738 (1987)

481 U.S. 738

VAN DRASEK v. WEBB, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
 
No. 86-319.
 
Argued April 29, 1987
Decided May 18, 1987

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 790 F.2d 90.

Stephen G. Milliken argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Michael K. Kellogg argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Albert G. Lauber, Jr., Richard A. Olderman, Charles R. Gross, and Keith T. Sefton.*

[Footnote *] Barton F. Stichman, David F. Addlestone, and Alvin J. Bronstein filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 481 U.S. 738, 739

 


U.S. Supreme Court

VAN DRASEK v. WEBB, 481 U.S. 738 (1987)

481 U.S. 738

VAN DRASEK v. WEBB, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
 
No. 86-319.
 
Argued April 29, 1987
Decided May 18, 1987

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 790 F.2d 90.

Stephen G. Milliken argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Michael K. Kellogg argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Albert G. Lauber, Jr., Richard A. Olderman, Charles R. Gross, and Keith T. Sefton.*

[Footnote *] Barton F. Stichman, David F. Addlestone, and Alvin J. Bronstein filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 481 U.S. 738, 739

Oral Argument - April 29, 1987
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.