UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT, 480 U.S. 615 (1987)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT, 480 U.S. 615 (1987)
480 U.S. 615 UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 85-1672.
Argued March 4, 1987
Decided March 24, 1987
- Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 760 F.2d 963.
Penelope M. Cooper argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Cristina C. Arguedas and Ted W. Cassman.*
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
[Footnote *] Nancy Gertner and Judith H. Mizner filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT, 480 U.S. 615 (1987)
480 U.S. 615 UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 85-1672.
Argued March 4, 1987
Decided March 24, 1987
- Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 760 F.2d 963.
Penelope M. Cooper argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Cristina C. Arguedas and Ted W. Cassman.*
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
[Footnote *] Nancy Gertner and Judith H. Mizner filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
Page 480 U.S. 615, 616
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.