CERBONE v. CONWAY, 479 U.S. 84 (1986)
U.S. Supreme Court
CERBONE v. CONWAY, 479 U.S. 84 (1986)
479 U.S. 84 CERBONE, JUSTICE OF THE VILLAGE COURT, VILLAGE OF MT. KISCO, NEW YORK,
ET AL. v. CONWAY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 84-1947.
Argued November 5, 1986
Decided November 17, 1986
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 750 F.2d 205 and 758 F.2d 46.
Michael F. Close argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was George J. Calcagnini.
George Russell Miller argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
[Footnote *] Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Charles A. Rothfeld, Barbara L. Herwig, and John F. Daly filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. Steven R. Shapiro filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
U.S. Supreme Court
CERBONE v. CONWAY, 479 U.S. 84 (1986)
479 U.S. 84 CERBONE, JUSTICE OF THE VILLAGE COURT, VILLAGE OF MT. KISCO, NEW YORK,
ET AL. v. CONWAY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 84-1947.
Argued November 5, 1986
Decided November 17, 1986
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 750 F.2d 205 and 758 F.2d 46.
Michael F. Close argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was George J. Calcagnini.
George Russell Miller argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
[Footnote *] Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Charles A. Rothfeld, Barbara L. Herwig, and John F. Daly filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. Steven R. Shapiro filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
