GRAY v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 475 U.S. 1089 (1986)

U.S. Supreme Court

GRAY v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT , 475 U.S. 1089 (1986)

475 U.S. 1089

Lawrence E. GRAY, Edward J. Murty, Jr. and Peter McC. Giesey
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.
No. 85-969

Supreme Court of the United States

March 24, 1986

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice WHITE, dissenting.

In this case the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the comprehensive remedial scheme established by Congress in the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 1 (CSRA) indicates a congressional intent to preclude judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act 2 of claims that could have been reviewed administratively under the CSRA. 248 U.S.App.D.C. 364, 771 F.2d 1504 (1985). While eight other Courts of Appeals have reached a similar conclusion, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held to the contrary. Dugan v. Ramsay, 727 F.2d 192 (1984). I would grant certiorari to resolve this conflict.

Footnotes

Footnote 1 Pub.L. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C.

Footnote 2 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq. (1976).[ Gray v. Office of Personnel Management 475 U.S. 1089 (1986) ]

 


U.S. Supreme Court

GRAY v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT , 475 U.S. 1089 (1986)

 475 U.S. 1089

Lawrence E. GRAY, Edward J. Murty, Jr. and Peter McC. Giesey
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.
No. 85-969

Supreme Court of the United States

March 24, 1986

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice WHITE, dissenting.

In this case the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the comprehensive remedial scheme established by Congress in the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 1 (CSRA) indicates a congressional intent to preclude judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act 2 of claims that could have been reviewed administratively under the CSRA. 248 U.S.App.D.C. 364, 771 F.2d 1504 (1985). While eight other Courts of Appeals have reached a similar conclusion, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held to the contrary. Dugan v. Ramsay, 727 F.2d 192 (1984). I would grant certiorari to resolve this conflict.

Footnotes

Footnote 1 Pub.L. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C.

Footnote 2 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq. (1976).[ Gray v. Office of Personnel Management 475 U.S. 1089 (1986) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.