EASTERN AIR LINES v. MAHFOUD, 474 U.S. 213 (1985)

U.S. Supreme Court

EASTERN AIR LINES v. MAHFOUD, 474 U.S. 213 (1985)

474 U.S. 213

EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. v. MAHFOUD ON BEHALF OF MAHFOUD ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 83-1807.

Argued January 15, 1985 Reargued October 9, 1985
Decided December 10, 1985

729 F.2d 777, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Richard M. Sharp reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jeffrey C. Martin, Suzanne E. Meeker, Francis G. Weller, and Marc J. Yellin.

George E. Farrell reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.

[Footnote *] Juanita M. Madole and Donald W. Madole filed a brief for Dina Avecilla et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

Page 474 U.S. 213, 214




U.S. Supreme Court

EASTERN AIR LINES v. MAHFOUD, 474 U.S. 213 (1985)

474 U.S. 213

EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. v. MAHFOUD ON BEHALF OF MAHFOUD ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 83-1807.

Argued January 15, 1985 Reargued October 9, 1985
Decided December 10, 1985

729 F.2d 777, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Richard M. Sharp reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jeffrey C. Martin, Suzanne E. Meeker, Francis G. Weller, and Marc J. Yellin.

George E. Farrell reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.

[Footnote *] Juanita M. Madole and Donald W. Madole filed a brief for Dina Avecilla et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

Page 474 U.S. 213, 214

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.