FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO, 470 U.S. 904 (1985)

U.S. Supreme Court

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO, 470 U.S. 904 (1985)

470 U.S. 904

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

No. 83-6663.

Argued February 19, 1985
Decided March 26, 1985

101 N. M. 58, 678 P.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

J. Thomas Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Henry R. Quintero.

Paul Bardacke, Attorney General of New Mexico, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Anthony Tupler, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 470 U.S. 904, 1




U.S. Supreme Court

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO, 470 U.S. 904 (1985)

470 U.S. 904

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

No. 83-6663.

Argued February 19, 1985
Decided March 26, 1985

101 N. M. 58, 678 P.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

J. Thomas Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Henry R. Quintero.

Paul Bardacke, Attorney General of New Mexico, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Anthony Tupler, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 470 U.S. 904, 1

Oral Argument - February 19, 1985
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.