WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN, 466 U.S. 521 (1984)

U.S. Supreme Court

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN, 466 U.S. 521 (1984)

466 U.S. 521

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 82-2042.
 
Argued March 19, 1984
Decided April 30, 1984

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 702 F.2d 137.

James W. Moore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Walter A. Paulson II and Stuart I. Saltman.

Clyde E. Murphy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, O. Peter Sherwood, Ronald L. Ellis, Judith Reed, and John W. Walker.*

[Footnote *] Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Barbara L. Neilson filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 466 U.S. 521, 522

 


U.S. Supreme Court

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN, 466 U.S. 521 (1984)

466 U.S. 521

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 82-2042.
 
Argued March 19, 1984
Decided April 30, 1984

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 702 F.2d 137.

James W. Moore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Walter A. Paulson II and Stuart I. Saltman.

Clyde E. Murphy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, O. Peter Sherwood, Ronald L. Ellis, Judith Reed, and John W. Walker.*

[Footnote *] Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Barbara L. Neilson filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 466 U.S. 521, 522

Oral Argument - March 19, 1984
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.