FINLEY v. MURRAY, 456 U.S. 604 (1982)

U.S. Supreme Court

FINLEY v. MURRAY, 456 U.S. 604 (1982)

456 U.S. 604

FINLEY, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS v. MURRAY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 80-2205.
 
Argued April 21, 1982
Decided May 17, 1982

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 634 F.2d 365.

Scott A. Mayer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joan S. Cherry.

John S. Elson, by appointment of the Court, 454 U.S. 1096, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

[Footnote *] Sybille Fritzsche filed a brief for the Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 456 U.S. 604, 605

 


U.S. Supreme Court

FINLEY v. MURRAY, 456 U.S. 604 (1982)

456 U.S. 604

FINLEY, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS v. MURRAY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 80-2205.
 
Argued April 21, 1982
Decided May 17, 1982

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 634 F.2d 365.

Scott A. Mayer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joan S. Cherry.

John S. Elson, by appointment of the Court, 454 U.S. 1096, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

[Footnote *] Sybille Fritzsche filed a brief for the Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 456 U.S. 604, 605

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.