HAWKINS v. TEXAS, 454 U.S. 919 (1981)

U.S. Supreme Court

HAWKINS v. TEXAS , 454 U.S. 919 (1981)

454 U.S. 919

Samuel HAWKINS, Petitioner
v.
TEXAS
No. 80-6514

Supreme Court of the United States

October 13, 1981

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1981.

See 454 U.S. 1093.

The motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231, 2950, 2973 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.[ Hawkins v. Texas 454 U.S. 919 (1981) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

HAWKINS v. TEXAS , 454 U.S. 919 (1981)

454 U.S. 919

Samuel HAWKINS, Petitioner
v.
TEXAS
No. 80-6514

Supreme Court of the United States

October 13, 1981

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1981.

See 454 U.S. 1093.

The motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231, 2950, 2973 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.[ Hawkins v. Texas 454 U.S. 919 (1981) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.