HUNTER v. DEAN, 439 U.S. 281 (1978)

U.S. Supreme Court

HUNTER v. DEAN, 439 U.S. 281 (1978)

439 U.S. 281

HUNTER v. DEAN, SHERIFF
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

No. 77-6248.

Argued October 11, 1978
Decided December 11, 1978

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 240 Ga. 214, 239 S. E. 2d 791.

James C. Bonner, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was C. Michael Abbott.

G. Stephen Parker argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Robert S. Stubbs II, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Don A. Langham, First Assistant Attorney General, John C. Walden, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and B. Dean Grindle, Jr., Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 439 U.S. 281, 282




U.S. Supreme Court

HUNTER v. DEAN, 439 U.S. 281 (1978)

439 U.S. 281

HUNTER v. DEAN, SHERIFF
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

No. 77-6248.

Argued October 11, 1978
Decided December 11, 1978

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 240 Ga. 214, 239 S. E. 2d 791.

James C. Bonner, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was C. Michael Abbott.

G. Stephen Parker argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Robert S. Stubbs II, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Don A. Langham, First Assistant Attorney General, John C. Walden, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and B. Dean Grindle, Jr., Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 439 U.S. 281, 282

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.