MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE, 439 U.S. 280 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court
MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE, 439 U.S. 280 (1978)
439 U.S. 280 MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 77-1388.
Argued November 28, 1978
Decided December 11, 1978
___ Mass. ___, 371 N.E.2d 777, affirmed by an equally divided Court
Barbara A. H. Smith, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General, and Stephen R. Delinsky, Assistant Attorney General.
Robert S. Cohen argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
[Footnote *] Fred E. Inbau, Wayne W. Schmidt, Robert Smith, and James P. Costello filed a brief for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE, 439 U.S. 280 (1978)
439 U.S. 280 MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 77-1388.
Argued November 28, 1978
Decided December 11, 1978
___ Mass. ___, 371 N.E.2d 777, affirmed by an equally divided Court
Barbara A. H. Smith, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General, and Stephen R. Delinsky, Assistant Attorney General.
Robert S. Cohen argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
[Footnote *] Fred E. Inbau, Wayne W. Schmidt, Robert Smith, and James P. Costello filed a brief for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 439 U.S. 280, 281
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.