Crist v. Cline,
434 U.S. 980 (1977)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

CRIST v. CLINE , 434 U.S. 980 (1977)

434 U.S. 980

Roger CRIST, as Warden of the Montana State Penitentiary, Deer Lodge, Montana, et al.
Merrel CLINE and L. R. Bretz
No. 76-1200

Supreme Court of the United States

December 5, 1977


This case is restored to the calendar for reargument. Counsel are requested to brief and discuss during oral argument the following questions:

Page 434 U.S. 980 , 981

1. Is the rule heretofore applied in the federal courts-that jeopardy attaches in jury trials when the jury is sworn-constitutionally mandated?

2. Should this Court hold that the Constitution does not require jeopardy to attach in any trial-state or federal, jury or nonjury- until the first witness is sworn?

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing th views of the United States on each of these questions.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL, dissenting.

By its order restoring this case to the calendar for rebriefing and additional oral argument, the Court appears once again to be "reach[ing] out" for a vehicle to change a long line of precedent. See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, at 117, (STEVENS, J., dissenting). The Court asks the parties to discuss the rule to be applied in the federal courts with regard to attachment of jeopardy, a rule that is very well established. [Footnote 1] But the parties here are Montana prison officials, represented by the Attorney General of Montana, and state-court defendants; they can hardly be considered knowledgeable about the federal courts. The Court attempts to surmount this difficulty by inviting the Solicitor General to provide the federal prosecutor's perspective on this important issue, yet it does not invite the other side, federal defendants or a representative of them, to submit a brief providing the opposing perspective.

In my view, the Court today does violence to two assumptions underlying Art. III of the Constitution: that we will [434 U.S. 980 , 982]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.