CARTER v. MILLER, 434 U.S. 356 (1978)

U.S. Supreme Court

CARTER v. MILLER, 434 U.S. 356 (1978)

434 U.S. 356

CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO v. MILLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 76-1171.
 
Argued November 29-30, 1977
Decided January 17, 1978

 547 F.2d 1314, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William R. Quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Daniel Pascale and Robert Retke.

Robert Masur argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Alan Freedman, Howard Eglit, and David Goldberger.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William B. Spann, Jr., and Robert B. McKay for the American Bar Assn.; and by James R. Madison and Norman C. Hile for the San Francisco Lawyers' Committee for Urban Affairs.

Page 434 U.S. 356, 357

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CARTER v. MILLER, 434 U.S. 356 (1978)

434 U.S. 356

CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO v. MILLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 76-1171.
 
Argued November 29-30, 1977
Decided January 17, 1978

 547 F.2d 1314, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William R. Quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Daniel Pascale and Robert Retke.

Robert Masur argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Alan Freedman, Howard Eglit, and David Goldberger.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William B. Spann, Jr., and Robert B. McKay for the American Bar Assn.; and by James R. Madison and Norman C. Hile for the San Francisco Lawyers' Committee for Urban Affairs.

Page 434 U.S. 356, 357

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.