Richmond Unified School District v. Berg, 434 U.S. 158 (1977)

U.S. Supreme Court

RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BERG, 434 U.S. 158 (1977)

434 U.S. 158

RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BERG
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 75-1069.
 
Argued October 5, 1977
Decided December 6, 1977

 528 F.2d 1208, vacated and remanded.

Arthur W. Walenta, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was John B. Clausen.

Mary C. Dunlap argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, 528 F.2d 1208, is vacated and the cause remanded for further consideration in light of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976), and Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, ante, p. 136, and for consideration of possible mootness.

[Footnote *] Jerry D. Anker, Robert E. Nagle, and David Rubin filed a brief for the National Education Assn. as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

Page 434 U.S. 158, 159

 


U.S. Supreme Court

RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BERG, 434 U.S. 158 (1977)

434 U.S. 158

RICHMOND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BERG
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 
No. 75-1069.
 
Argued October 5, 1977
Decided December 6, 1977

 528 F.2d 1208, vacated and remanded.

Arthur W. Walenta, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was John B. Clausen.

Mary C. Dunlap argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, 528 F.2d 1208, is vacated and the cause remanded for further consideration in light of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976), and Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, ante, p. 136, and for consideration of possible mootness.

[Footnote *] Jerry D. Anker, Robert E. Nagle, and David Rubin filed a brief for the National Education Assn. as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

Page 434 U.S. 158, 159

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.