DARDEN v. FLORIDA, 430 U.S. 704 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court
DARDEN v. FLORIDA, 430 U.S. 704 (1977)
430 U.S. 704 DARDEN v. FLORIDA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 76-5382.
Argued March 28, 1977
Decided April 19, 1977
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 329 So.2d 287.
Geoffrey M. Kalmus argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Richard W. Prospect, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, dissents and, adhering to his view that capital punishment is in all circumstances prohibited as cruel and unusual punishment by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, would set aside the death sentence imposed in this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
DARDEN v. FLORIDA, 430 U.S. 704 (1977)
430 U.S. 704 DARDEN v. FLORIDA
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 76-5382.
Argued March 28, 1977
Decided April 19, 1977
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 329 So.2d 287.
Geoffrey M. Kalmus argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Richard W. Prospect, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, dissents and, adhering to his view that capital punishment is in all circumstances prohibited as cruel and unusual punishment by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, would set aside the death sentence imposed in this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
