MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, 430 U.S. 550 (1977)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, 430 U.S. 550 (1977)

430 U.S. 550

MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER
REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 75-6909.
 
Argued March 22-23, 1977
Decided March 29, 1977

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 512 F.2d 88.

Bennett H. Brummer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Albert G. Caruana.

Arthur Joel Berger, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, and William L. Rogers, Special Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 430 U.S. 550, 551

 


U.S. Supreme Court

MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, 430 U.S. 550 (1977)

430 U.S. 550

MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER
REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 75-6909.
 
Argued March 22-23, 1977
Decided March 29, 1977

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 512 F.2d 88.

Bennett H. Brummer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Albert G. Caruana.

Arthur Joel Berger, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, and William L. Rogers, Special Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 430 U.S. 550, 551

Oral Argument - March 23, 1977
Oral Argument - March 22, 1977
Opinion Announcement - March 29, 1977
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.