Pearson v. Dodd
429 U.S. 396 (1977)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Pearson v. Dodd, 429 U.S. 396 (1977)

Pearson v. Dodd

No. 75-1318

Argued December 1, 1976

Decided January 12, 1977

429 U.S. 396

Syllabus

Where, under West Virginia law, absolute title to appellant's oil and gas interest in land had vested in the State at the expiration of the 18-month period after sale of the interest to the State for nonpayment of taxes, during which period appellant might have exercised but did not exercise her right to redeem, appellant has no constitutionally protected property or entitlement interest upon which she may base a challenge of constitutional deficiency in the notice provisions attending the State's subsequent sale of the interest to appellee Dodd, and hence the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Appeal dismissed. Reported below: ___ W.Va. ___, 221 S. .2d 171.

Primary Holding
The intentional tort of conversion can be defined as the willful exercise of control or dominion over a chattel, interfering with another's right to control it so significantly that the person exercising control over the chattel must pay the plaintiff for its full value.
Facts
Without getting the permission of Senator Dodd, two of his former employees made copies of key documents in his files and gave them to a journalist, who published an article with the information that they contained. Some of the documents included letters from petitioners and other office records. The Senator sued the journalist under theories of conversion and invasion of privacy.

Disclaimer: Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.