CASSIUS v. ARIZONA, 420 U.S. 514 (1975)

U.S. Supreme Court

CASSIUS v. ARIZONA, 420 U.S. 514 (1975)

420 U.S. 514

CASSIUS v. ARIZONA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
 
No. 74-5140.
 
Argued January 21, 1975.
Decided March 3, 1975.

110 Ariz. 485, 520 P.2d 1109, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Frederick S. Klein argued the cause for petitioner pro hac vice. With him on the briefs was John M. Neis.

William J. Schafer III argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Bruce E. Babbitt, Attorney General of Arizona, N. Warner Lee, former Attorney General, and Grove M. Callison, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN and MR. JUSTICE POWELL dissent.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 420 U.S. 514, 515

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CASSIUS v. ARIZONA, 420 U.S. 514 (1975)

420 U.S. 514

CASSIUS v. ARIZONA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
 
No. 74-5140.
 
Argued January 21, 1975.
Decided March 3, 1975.

110 Ariz. 485, 520 P.2d 1109, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Frederick S. Klein argued the cause for petitioner pro hac vice. With him on the briefs was John M. Neis.

William J. Schafer III argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Bruce E. Babbitt, Attorney General of Arizona, N. Warner Lee, former Attorney General, and Grove M. Callison, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN and MR. JUSTICE POWELL dissent.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 420 U.S. 514, 515

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.