UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ, 420 U.S. 513 (1975)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ, 420 U.S. 513 (1975)

420 U.S. 513

UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 73-820.

Argued January 14, 1975.
Decided March 3, 1975.

484 F.2d 590, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Paul L. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, and Gerald P. Norton.

Joseph Beeler, by appointment of the Court, 419 U.S. 961, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Donald J. Martin.*

[Footnote *] Sanford Jay Rosen and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 420 U.S. 513, 514




U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ, 420 U.S. 513 (1975)

420 U.S. 513

UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 73-820.

Argued January 14, 1975.
Decided March 3, 1975.

484 F.2d 590, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Paul L. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, and Gerald P. Norton.

Joseph Beeler, by appointment of the Court, 419 U.S. 961, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Donald J. Martin.*

[Footnote *] Sanford Jay Rosen and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 420 U.S. 513, 514

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.