TODD v. DANIELL, 42 U.S. 289 (1843)

U.S. Supreme Court

TODD v. DANIELL, 42 U.S. 289 (1843)

42 U.S. 289 (How.)

JAMES TODD, APPELLANT,
v.
OTIS DANIELL, DEFENDANT.

January Term, 1843

AN agreement in writing between the counsel, as well for the appellant as for the appellee, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this case shall be affirmed with legal damages and costs for the said Daniell, having been filed; it is thereupon considered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of 6 per centum per annum; and also that the said appellee recover of the said appellant, the further sum of $125 for the costs of the transcript of the record in the Circuit Court according to the said agreement.[ Todd v. Daniell 42 U.S. 289 (1843) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

TODD v. DANIELL, 42 U.S. 289 (1843)

 42 U.S. 289 (How.)

JAMES TODD, APPELLANT,
v.
OTIS DANIELL, DEFENDANT.

January Term, 1843

AN agreement in writing between the counsel, as well for the appellant as for the appellee, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this case shall be affirmed with legal damages and costs for the said Daniell, having been filed; it is thereupon considered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of 6 per centum per annum; and also that the said appellee recover of the said appellant, the further sum of $125 for the costs of the transcript of the record in the Circuit Court according to the said agreement.[ Todd v. Daniell 42 U.S. 289 (1843) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.