TODD v. DANIELL, 42 U.S. 289 (1843)
U.S. Supreme Court
TODD v. DANIELL, 42 U.S. 289 (1843)
42 U.S. 289 (How.)
JAMES TODD, APPELLANT,
v.
OTIS DANIELL, DEFENDANT.
January Term, 1843
AN agreement in writing between the counsel, as well for the appellant as for the appellee, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this case shall be affirmed with legal damages and costs for the said Daniell, having been filed; it is thereupon considered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of 6 per centum per annum; and also that the said appellee recover of the said appellant, the further sum of $125 for the costs of the transcript of the record in the Circuit Court according to the said agreement.[ Todd v. Daniell 42 U.S. 289 (1843) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
TODD v. DANIELL, 42 U.S. 289 (1843)
42 U.S. 289 (How.)
JAMES TODD, APPELLANT,
v.
OTIS DANIELL, DEFENDANT.
January Term, 1843
AN agreement in writing between the counsel, as well for the appellant as for the appellee, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this case shall be affirmed with legal damages and costs for the said Daniell, having been filed; it is thereupon considered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of 6 per centum per annum; and also that the said appellee recover of the said appellant, the further sum of $125 for the costs of the transcript of the record in the Circuit Court according to the said agreement.[ Todd v. Daniell 42 U.S. 289 (1843) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.