HOLDER v. BANKS, 417 U.S. 187 (1974)
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLDER v. BANKS, 417 U.S. 187 (1974)
417 U.S. 187 HOLDER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE v. BANKS.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 73-841.
Argued April 24, 1974.
Decided May 28, 1974.
Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.
Karl J. Stipher argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Frederick P. Bamberger, Harold H. Bredell, John E. Early, Erle A. Kightlinger, R. M. Kroger, C. Wendell Martin, James L. Miller, Wayne C. Ponader, Floyd W. Burns, C. B. Dutton, Thomas M. Scanlon, Ben J. Weaver, Howard S. Young, Jr., and Norman P. Rowe.
Morton Stavis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William M. Kunstler and Doris Peterson.*
[Footnote *] Melvin L. Wulf, Leon Friedman, and Joel M. Gora filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLDER v. BANKS, 417 U.S. 187 (1974)
417 U.S. 187 HOLDER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE v. BANKS.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 73-841.
Argued April 24, 1974.
Decided May 28, 1974.
Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.
Karl J. Stipher argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Frederick P. Bamberger, Harold H. Bredell, John E. Early, Erle A. Kightlinger, R. M. Kroger, C. Wendell Martin, James L. Miller, Wayne C. Ponader, Floyd W. Burns, C. B. Dutton, Thomas M. Scanlon, Ben J. Weaver, Howard S. Young, Jr., and Norman P. Rowe.
Morton Stavis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William M. Kunstler and Doris Peterson.*
[Footnote *] Melvin L. Wulf, Leon Friedman, and Joel M. Gora filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
