JIMENEZ v. BETO, 405 U.S. 910 (1972)

U.S. Supreme Court

JIMENEZ v. BETO , 405 U.S. 910 (1972)

405 U.S. 910

Richard JIMENEZ, petitioner,
v.
George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.
No. 71-5709.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 22, 1972

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972).

For opinion after remand see 468 F.2d 616.[ Jimenez v. Beto 405 U.S. 910 (1972) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

JIMENEZ v. BETO , 405 U.S. 910 (1972)

405 U.S. 910

Richard JIMENEZ, petitioner,
v.
George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.
No. 71-5709.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 22, 1972

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972).

For opinion after remand see 468 F.2d 616.[ Jimenez v. Beto 405 U.S. 910 (1972) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.